Q Why is our evening paper called The Echo?
A. Because we’ve heard it all before
In tonight’s South Wales Echo is the revelation of a
masterplan which will connect the city centre with its waterfront. Given that this
was a primary objective of the Cardiff Bay Development Corporation (CBDC) which
received £500m in grant aid from the Welsh Office and Assembly someone may
perhaps need to revisit the Auditor General for Wales’ report of June 2001.
"Securing the Future of Cardiff Bay"? Both Lloyd George Avenue and
Callaghan Square, constructed by CBDC under a Private Sector Initiative scheme are
identified as areas for development in the new masterplan. The Western Mail reported
on 7 September 2011 the Welsh Government revelation that the full cost of the
PFI scheme, including its 25 year payback period, would be £188.8 million.
The default setting of the present Welsh Government is, if
course, that everything is someone else’s fault but it is understood that they
may have become stakeholders in part of this proposed new development. That
will be worth investigating further.
It is also interesting to note that the new proposals
include a light rail transport system connecting the city centre and Bay. That
was an integral part of the original proposal for the, then, Bute Avenue
project proposed by CBDC and designed by MBM Architects of Barcelona fame but
that element failed to secure funding. The ‘Great Wall of Butetown’
presented by the existing railway embankment thus remained to separate the
indigenous residents from new development. Critiques of the much diluted
outcomes may be found in several editions of the Royal Society of Architects
in Wales journal ,Touchstone, and Capital
Cardiff edited by John Punter and Alan Hooper published in 2006.
There is probably consensus that both Callaghan Square and
Lloyd George Avenue are nowhere near as good as was originally intended they
should be. The question we now face is whether they will be any better? Both
these and the several other key areas identified in Cardiff Councils green
paper Rebuilding Momentum must be the
subject of close scrutiny and wide debate if we are to avoid a repetition of
past mistakes. We must also avoid the assumption that such mistakes may be
attributed to the long defunct Development Corporation. Some of us clearly have longer memories than
others and will recall the Atlantic Wharf development, a predecessor of the
larger Cardiff Bay redevelopment. As I recall, credit for that was claimed by an
individual now associated with its proposed redevelopment. That may allay any suggestion that the almost
explicit criticism of CBDCs developments in the green paper evidences some personal
score settling on a grand scale
The green paper may of course be just another piece of
wishful thinking on the part of the City Council, a bit of optimistic flag
waving in the depths of a serious recession in the property market. I have so
far successfully avoided the use of the dread word ‘regeneration’ but at first
blush their green paper has some of the thumbprints – or all- pervading smell
of bullshit- that marks it as the cliché ridden output of ‘regeneration experts’.
Instead of ‘continental style boulevards
lined with restaurants and cafes’ we now have ‘significant public squares’ and ‘high
density Scandinavian-style living’. Should we assume that the latter will
happen if and when the current low density occupation of unoccupied apartments
in Cardiff Bay has been absorbed by a much improved property market?
Within the proposals is another interesting suggestion which
is to extend the pedestrianisation of St Mary Street to Callaghan Square. Students
at the Welsh School of Architecture proposed this as an outcome of a design
charrette held there to look at an alternative to the traffic hub that Bute/
Callaghan Square would inevitably become. Their solution was perhaps even more
radical than that now proposed in treating Mill Lane (the Café Quarter, remember?)
and what is now Callaghan Square as a whole - a large urban square with an elevated
railway running across it and some buildings in it. Despite the dreadful Marriott Hotel
building there were, then, a number of interesting buildings which had not yet
been the subject of compulsory purchase and demolition or arson. It would have
been an altogether more interesting place than the central business district
now proposed.
Again, we have heard it all before but back then no-one was
listening. Their ears were clogged up with the bullshit of ‘urban regeneration’
and we should not let that happen again. We need to make urbanism an electoral
issue in Wales.
More will follow as these plans are revealed further………
The paper is open for a six week public consultation from
Friday. Views can be submitted from Friday at
www.cardiff.gov.uk/rebuildingmomentum
Thanks for kicking off, Bob. I've just crawled through the Green Paper. I've read (and helped to write) a few such document s in my time; you always expect a degree of bullshit and jargon, but you also expect some substance. It needs a serious response, because it's dealing with serious matters, but where should this come from?
ReplyDeleteAs you rightly observe this is just a 'kick off' based on a) what I have seen reported rather than sight and detailed reading of the green paper and b) my admittedly cynical assumption that it will be the 'same old- same old'
DeleteIf it matches those low expectations, particularly in respect of any substance as regards achievable and enforceable aspirations on design and construction quality then further comment will be more considered, serious and sustained. Best wishes. Bob